By Raymond Zhou
(China Daily)
Updated: 2004-10-21 08:58
A
young hostage is carried off the crime scene by policemen after
his kidnapper
was shot by police in Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province on
August 17.
Two hostages were rescued unhurt. [newsphoto]
The crime scene: a
supermarket. The victim: a pregnant woman. The offender: a young
man holding a sharp knife to her neck.Soon the place was
surrounded by more than 200 police officers and dozens of police
vehicles. A big crowd of spectators had gathered. A few minutes
later a petite young woman emerged. She was wearing a pretty
skirt and looked nothing like the crisis negotiator that she
was.
She slowly
approached the kidnapper, her gaze always on him, but full of
understanding.
"Hi, I'm here
to help you. I have no bad intentions. I know you're doing this
out of helplessness. Would you please calm down?
"Whatever is
in your mind, please tell me about it. I'll do the best I can.
It's not easy for our parents to bring us up. All of us can get
headaches now and then. But we're not just living for ourselves.
If something happens to us, our parents would be
heartbroken."
The talk lasted an
hour. Onlookers were getting fretful. Then the kidnapper
demanded his ransom: 3 million yuan (US$36,300) plus a getaway
car.
The female
negotiator nodded: "Take it easy. We'll meet your needs.
Can you tell me what kind of car you want? And 3 million yuan,
too, right?"
As time went on,
the kidnapper became more agitated. Before he made any abrupt
move, the negotiator said: "I know how much anguish you're
in. But isn't the lady you're holding also in pain? Think of her
unborn baby, who is totally innocent. We've been nice to you.
Couldn't you be a little nicer to her and the baby in her
womb?"
A flicker of
hesitation. But he quickly reverted to: "No way. Why should
I care about them? Give me the money and the car! Quick!"
But he was
wavering, and as he wavered, the knife withdrew a little from
the victim's throat.
The negotiator used
hand gestures to calm him down. "Look at the pregnant lady.
Hasn't she suffered enough? You don't mind her sitting down, do
you?"
As he acquiesced,
the negotiator reached out to the pregnant woman and helped her,
saying to the kidnapper at the same time: "Thank you.
You're kind at heart. Why do things have to be like this? Why
can't we talk? Everything can be discussed."
There was a
scuffle, she separated the hostage from the knife and waiting
policemen sprang in to hold him down.
Birth of the crisis
negotiator
China is seeing a
surge in hostage crises. The Guangzhou-based Southern Metropolis
Daily reports that there have been more than 20 reported cases
in the past year. Things have exacerbated in the past two
months, with almost weekly stories of armed kidnapping.
What we have
related above wasn't one of them. It was a dress rehearsal for a
hostage negotiation.
In the Beijing
suburb of Changping, a seminar was held over the summer to train
people in negotiation techniques for these situations. More than
50 of the best policemen and women, recruited from all over the
city, went through extensive tests in psychology. Only 17 were
selected. They were to be China's first batch of hostage
negotiators.
Three months of
lectures, case analyses, demonstrations and run-throughs led to
consensus that talking it out is often the best way out for a
hostage stand-off.
The highest
principle for negotiation is to guarantee the life and safety of
the hostage, said Professor Gao Feng, who added that it is not
commendable to use violence against violence. In a society
governed by law and human rights, even the life of the criminal
suspect should not be taken away lightly before there is a court
verdict. Shooting the kidnapper should be the last solution,
said the professor of Beijing Police Academy, who was the first
Chinese expert to study the handling of such negotiations.
Doing so may also
leave a psychological scar on the hostage. It may even by
mistake hurt the wrong target. On July 2, a police sniper tried
to shoot a kidnapper in a Yinchuan restaurant in Northwest
China. Sadly he hit the hostage instead.
Traditionally,
killing the kidnapper, whatever the cost, was considered the
ultimate victory. But the only international standard for
evaluating such crisis intervention is whether the life of the
hostage is saved when the dust settles, Gao said.
The point was hit
home in a case on July 7, around the same time as the story of
the negotiator training programme was making its rounds in the
nation's media.
On that fateful
morning, Chen Haoran, a 23-year-old peasant, forced his way into
a red Volkswagen Bora. The driver was a young mother named Guo,
who had just dropped off her daughter at a kindergarten in
Changchun, capital of Northeast China's Jilin Province.
Brandishing a knife, Chen asked for a ransom of 100,000 yuan
(US$12,000).
Before they could
drive off from the crowded street, the car was quickly
surrounded by hundreds of policemen and thousands of spectators.
After three hours' stalemate, police fired four shots, within 10
seconds of one another, killing Chen. But Guo had been stabbed
seven times. She died on the way to the hospital.
The public, as well
as the victim's family, questioned the wisdom of the police
action: Why did negotiation fail? Why did police wait to shoot
until the hostage had already been harmed? Why was there a
10-second lapse between the first and the last shots?
The police, on
their part, defended their decision: They had tried their best
to meet the demands of the kidnapper, even offering to exchange
the hostage for one of the policemen. The kidnapper and the
hostage were very close, and it was hard to see clearly from
outside the car. "We would have kept on talking to him if
he had not harmed the hostage," said Tang Qinghua, deputy
director of Changchun Public Security Bureau.
A reporter from
CCTV asked if there were any professional negotiators in
Changchun.
"All the
principal officials from our bureau were on the spot. If I
cannot be counted as an expert, surely the other bureau chiefs
can," Tang said.
Qualities of a
negotiator
Therein lies the
rub.
Tang and his
colleagues might be the best qualified in that city to have
conducted the negotiation, but they were not professionally
trained.
A well-trained
negotiator has a success rate of 80 per cent, Professor Gao
said. But the current success rate in China is less than 50 per
cent, and even that is achieved mostly by chance. He blamed
failures like Changchun on a lack of negotiation skills.
As many police
chiefs showed up on the scene, the danger of chaos lurked
because a clear reporting and responsibility system was not up
and running, said Hao Hongkui, associate professor at the
Beijing-based China People's Public Security University.
A negotiating team
usually consists of three people: a team leader who co-ordinates
everything, a chief negotiator who does all the talking, and an
assistant who records all the details of the scene and can take
over if the chief negotiator has to be replaced.
The frequent change
of negotiators in the Changchun incident was a big mistake. The
negotiator has to establish a rapport with the kidnapper, to get
on the same wavelength with him so that there can be a more
meaningful communication. Unless absolutely necessary, one
person should carry the negotiation to the end.
As it is, the pool
of negotiators is made up of police, but not all good policemen
can be good negotiators. The prerequisites for a good
negotiator, according to Gao Feng, include a wealth of legal
knowledge and a storehouse of miscellaneous information. He or
she must be extremely sharp, observant and expressive, have
quick reflexes and rely mostly on gut feelings. On top of that,
he or she must be able to act well enough to show their emotions
with verbal and body language.
It all comes down
to the moment when the kidnapper asks "Is it too late to
lay down my arms?" and that's the first sign of success for
the negotiator, said Gao.
Wang from Tongzhou
Police Bureau, one of the 17 trainees in the programme, was
learning to modulate his voice and control the pace of his
conversation during one of the practices. Set in a beauty salon,
he pretended to be the owner and uncle of the hostage. When the
kidnapper demanded 80 million yuan (US$9.6 million), he quipped:
"Brother, if I had 80 million, I wouldn't be in this
business. I'd be in real estate and driving a Mercedes."
The kidnapper burst
into a chuckle and the tension was slightly defused.
Wang, who would not
reveal his real name because of the nature of his work, said he
must have the upper hand. "If my opponent's brain is
running at 1,000 rotations, mine must run at 3,000 to outsmart
him."
The immediate
priority of a negotiator is to dissipate tension. The kidnapper
tends to be in an extremely unstable, emotional state and may
abruptly resort to violence. But rarely is his ultimate
intention to harm the hostage. That gives the negotiator room to
manipulate the situation and put the kidnapper at ease.
A professional
negotiator cannot guarantee success, but he or she would not
make such blunders as speaking in a condescending or commanding
voice, and neither will there be dramatic ultimata like
"I'll give you 10 minutes or..."
Value of life
The shift of
emphasis, from killing the kidnapper to saving the hostage, can
only happen at a time when there is a public awakening to the
value of human rights. But it also puts the police in a riskier
position.
"When a shot
is fired, the first cop who rushes in has the job to protect the
hostage. It is the second cop's responsibility to contain the
kidnapper," said Wang.
The seminar was
very clear in listing priorities: first rescue the hostage, then
protect the police, and finally minimize harm to the criminal.
Wang said this
deviates from practice in Western countries. "The West
places the lives of the negotiators and cops at the forefront to
reduce unnecessary human loss, so negotiations are often
conducted by telephone or at a safe distance, but we have vowed
to put the lives of the public before our own," said Wang.
He said close-range negotiations were much more effective in
breaking down the kidnappers' mental barriers.
If this sounds like
taking the moral high ground, calls for restraint from
unnecessarily killing the hostage taker have elicited some
negative reaction. Xi Wei, a Beijing policeman, complained in
the Beijing News about what he perceived as the overemphasis on
the rights of the kidnapper: One is destroying public safety and
does not even respect his own life, and the other is risking his
life to protect this safety. Is the life of the former more
valuable than that of the latter?
"Actually
nobody is advocating a total ban of using lethal force against
kidnappers. It's just that it should be used with more caution.
He may have broken the law, but he should be brought to justice
in a court of law. What he thinks and says at that time may well
be a lesson and a deterrent for people with similar
inclinations. If we kill him on the spot, it will not be a total
victory for our rescue efforts," said Wang.
The risk to the
negotiator, said Professor Gao, is fairly low, with the
worldwide figure for attacks on negotiators at 3.6 per cent. Yet
dynamics at a hostage scene can change so fast that a slight
miscalculation may end up with the tragic loss of the lives of
the hostage or the cop-cum-negotiator.
Next year the 17
Beijing negotiators will go through another round of training
and some will be sent overseas to hone their skills. In
addition, Professor Mei Jianming of China People's Public
Security University has invited experts from the US Federal
Investigation Bureau for exchanges and lectures. Many of the
teachers and trainees in the current programme have also been
sent to Chengdu, Shanghai and Guangzhou to get more hands-on
experience and put theory into practice.
"We are only
just starting, and have a lot to learn. We need more cases for
analysis. We'll take it one step at a time," said Gao Feng.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-10/21/content_384367.htm
|